<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Talking back&#8230;..</title>
	<link>http://www.psychicadvice.com/blog/all-archives/2007/01/04/466/</link>
	<description>Live. Love. Learn.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Cosmic_Tiger</title>
		<link>http://www.psychicadvice.com/blog/all-archives/2007/01/04/466/#comment-1190</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 19:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.psychicadvice.com/blog/all-archives/2007/01/04/466/#comment-1190</guid>
					<description>If I was a good enough psychic, I would want to be paid for it.  However, there are times my gift would be used and not for money.  I am sure there are many times Da Juana uses her ability and does not get reimbursed for it.  I would be more inclined to pay Da Juana than a preacher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I was a good enough psychic, I would want to be paid for it.  However, there are times my gift would be used and not for money.  I am sure there are many times Da Juana uses her ability and does not get reimbursed for it.  I would be more inclined to pay Da Juana than a preacher.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: nealparr</title>
		<link>http://www.psychicadvice.com/blog/all-archives/2007/01/04/466/#comment-1188</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 08:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.psychicadvice.com/blog/all-archives/2007/01/04/466/#comment-1188</guid>
					<description>You left off the quote. I was merely commenting on your own words.

Quote: “While we are on the subject, some good church-going people have mentioned that I shouldn’t be paid for my gift but they don’t mind paying the preacher. How long do they think I could live with reading for everyone all day long-seven days a week—without having money to feed, clothe and keep a roof over my head?”

Let's word it another way...

If you were to see two clients a day for a half-hour reading each, and then you take a day off for recuperation from that hour's worth of ordeal, then you are are still working at least three out of the seven days in a week. 3 x 2 x $115.50 = $693 a week... and you only work 3 hours! That's $2,772 a month only working 12 hours out of the entire month.

Your post didn't address what my comment was actually about. You said, &quot;some good church-going people have mentioned that I shouldn’t be paid for my gift but they don’t mind paying the preacher.&quot;

And what I was getting at is: Do you know any preachers that make that much? Of course they don't mind paying the preacher. The preacher doesn't charge that kind of money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You left off the quote. I was merely commenting on your own words.</p>
<p>Quote: “While we are on the subject, some good church-going people have mentioned that I shouldn’t be paid for my gift but they don’t mind paying the preacher. How long do they think I could live with reading for everyone all day long-seven days a week—without having money to feed, clothe and keep a roof over my head?”</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s word it another way&#8230;</p>
<p>If you were to see two clients a day for a half-hour reading each, and then you take a day off for recuperation from that hour&#8217;s worth of ordeal, then you are are still working at least three out of the seven days in a week. 3 x 2 x $115.50 = $693 a week&#8230; and you only work 3 hours! That&#8217;s $2,772 a month only working 12 hours out of the entire month.</p>
<p>Your post didn&#8217;t address what my comment was actually about. You said, &#8220;some good church-going people have mentioned that I shouldn’t be paid for my gift but they don’t mind paying the preacher.&#8221;</p>
<p>And what I was getting at is: Do you know any preachers that make that much? Of course they don&#8217;t mind paying the preacher. The preacher doesn&#8217;t charge that kind of money.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christy</title>
		<link>http://www.psychicadvice.com/blog/all-archives/2007/01/04/466/#comment-1186</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 23:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.psychicadvice.com/blog/all-archives/2007/01/04/466/#comment-1186</guid>
					<description>I can't help but put my two sense on this blog. To me, it seems that preachers and mediums are two different things in first place. I rememeber growing up listening to preachers and how they told the congregation to fear god. That really brings the money in there.. Something like, if you take care of the preacher then you'll be rewarded more in heaven!! From a mediums point of view, the money isn't the object. It is nice to have, but  mediums just want to help that person who has paid to come see them and help reach the person he/she wants to communicate with on the otherside.
The person is more apt to be open minded if the person has sought after a quality paid mediium. In return a fullfilling reading is held and both parties are lifted spirtuality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help but put my two sense on this blog. To me, it seems that preachers and mediums are two different things in first place. I rememeber growing up listening to preachers and how they told the congregation to fear god. That really brings the money in there.. Something like, if you take care of the preacher then you&#8217;ll be rewarded more in heaven!! From a mediums point of view, the money isn&#8217;t the object. It is nice to have, but  mediums just want to help that person who has paid to come see them and help reach the person he/she wants to communicate with on the otherside.<br />
The person is more apt to be open minded if the person has sought after a quality paid mediium. In return a fullfilling reading is held and both parties are lifted spirtuality.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

